Skip to content
Current page: QA Regression Testing Agent Workflow

Run a QA agent against the exact code change

Use a QA agent to trace acceptance criteria to checks, reproduce failures, inspect edge cases, and report test gaps before merge.

PullPlane keeps the QA brief, implementation artifact, and merge decision together so the report can distinguish tested behavior from assumptions.

Build a testable brief

Write observable acceptance criteria, important user flows, relevant platforms or environments, known edge cases, and existing regression evidence. Attach logs, screenshots, or failing tests when they help reproduce the issue.

Ask QA to verify, not merely summarize

The QA role inspects the implementation, runs useful available checks, exercises important paths, and reports expected versus actual behavior with reproduction steps. A read-only QA merge gate can be required for selected priorities.

  • Checks performed and their result
  • Behavior verified manually or through tests
  • Coverage gaps and environment limits
  • Failures that should block the merge

Keep the human reviewer accountable

A QA report is only as strong as its scope and available environment. The team reviews untested paths and warnings alongside the code diff and repository checks before deciding to merge.

Bring every coding agent onto one shared plane.

Plan with your team, run Claude and Codex in isolated sandboxes, and review the work before it ships.

Start a project